Excellent that you found the solution!
Best,
Hans Ekkehard
--
Prof. Dr. Hans Ekkehard Plesser
Department of Data Science
Faculty of Science and Technology
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
PO Box 5003, 1432 Aas, Norway
Phone +47 6723 1560
Email hans.ekkehard.plesser@nmbu.no<mailto:hans.ekkehard.plesser@nmbu.no>
Home
http://arken.nmbu.no/~plesser
From: Evgenia Kartsaki <evgenia.kartsaki(a)inria.fr>
Date: Monday, 28 August 2023 at 11:58
To: users(a)nest-simulator.org <users(a)nest-simulator.org>
Subject: [NEST Users] Re: Network simulation of Hanuschkin (2010) - precise spike times
[Du mottar ikke ofte e-post fra evgenia.kartsaki(a)inria.fr. Finn ut hvorfor dette er viktig
p?
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
Hello Prof. Plesser,
I did use a voltmeter and the membrane potential fluctuated but always stayed below the
threshold. However, it's not related to the connection strengths, but the external
input.
Specifically, when each neuron received an additional excitatory Poissonian spike train at
2.71 kHz then, it has to also receive a constant external direct current of 499 pA
(section 2.3.1 of the paper). This requires the parameter I_e to be set to 499 pA in the
neuron_params. This resolves my issue and gives an average firing rate of 10Hz.
Thanks a lot for your help!
Best regards,
Evgenia
_______________________________________________
NEST Users mailing list -- users(a)nest-simulator.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)nest-simulator.org